RSVP Vacations is being sued by Bel Ami and several of its models for hiring them for a cruise and then dumping them in godforsaken Tunisia.
According to court documents filed in California, nearly a dozen Slavic Bel Ami porn stars were hired by RSVP to “mix and mingle” with passengers on a gay cruise through the Mediterranean. Bel Ami maintains the models were told to keep the fact RSVP hired them on the down-low, “suggesting that the young men should lie and say the cruise was a ‘reward from Bel Ami for their hard work’ if anyone asked.” In exchange for providing the talent, RSVP told Bel Ami it could film the models frolicking non-sexually around the ship.
But rumors started circling before the boat even left port and, when the boys attracted too much attention, RSVP allegedly kicked them off the Nieuw Amsterdam, stranding them in Tunisia.
At the time, Tunisia was in the aftermath of the tumultuous civil uprising that became known as the Arab Spring; an uprising so powerful that it led to the removal of long-time President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali. The protests constituted the most dramatic wave of social and political unrest in Tunisia in three decades and resulted in scores of deaths and injuries.
With RSVP supposedly holding their passports and belongings hostage, the models had no choice but to comply. Ironically, the Nieuw Amsterdam was just one day away from Italy, an EU member nation that would have allowed them to easily return home to Hungary and the Czech Republic.
Instead they spent a sleepless night in Tunisia, with no contacts, no resources and unable to speak the language.
Bel Ami and the models are suing RSVP and Holland America cruise line for breach of contract, fraud, intentional interference with contract, negligence, and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
This isn’t the first trouble RSVP has had in the Muslim world: Just a few weeks ago, a planned excursion to Morocco was canceled for reasons that remain unclear.
Source: GayPornGossip.com (NSFW). Photos QueerMeNow (NSFW)
Tad, 
Dave Cantrall, 
Lance and 7 others are discussing. 
Dave Cantrall 4:46 am on July 16, 2012 Permalink |
If completely true as stated in this article, it does not surprised me about RSVP – which BTW is part of Atlantis Events; both fairly recently have been engaged in practices of which is NOT exactly what could be called “above board”, and/or using common sense.
John 12:55 pm on July 17, 2012 Permalink |
Its my understanding they were having public sex and thats why they were thrown off.
Dave Cantrall 8:42 pm on July 17, 2012 Permalink |
John, could you inform us as to where or what source your information comes from regarding “they were having public sex and that’s why they were thrown off”?
There is a news link regarding this Bel Ami/RSVP situation that states all that is apparently known regarding this case, and without all the risque photos that so many websites seem intent on splashing all over and around this news event – and that is “The Courthouse News”.
I hope the news media – major or otherwise – will continue follow-ups regarding this unfortunate situation with Bel Ami … unfortunate indeed for those young men from Bel Ami.
As for RSVP, assuming that they did hire members of the Bel Ami team to be on board that particular cruise – and I don’t see any reason not to assume that – then RSVP had an obligation to those young Bel Ami men in the same sense that they had to any other cruise passenger on board that same cruise.
With this incident regarding the actions taken by RSVP, and not too long ago another incident of a “sexual nature” on board a Gay Cruise with Atlantis Events, I am more than ready to try something different for my next cruise.
Dave
Rick Dallin 1:23 pm on July 17, 2012 Permalink |
Public sex on a Gay cruise..OMG. If this article is completely true and even if there was sex going on in the public areas. I hope that RSVP and Atlantis events gets sued and loses big time in court. There is just no excuse why they couldn’t consel them, giving them a chance, or at least kick them off in another EU country like Italy. They should have also given the poor guys their belongings and their passports. I hope they do lose because that is what I feel this company deserves. Rick D. San Diego.
Rick Dallin 1:28 pm on July 17, 2012 Permalink |
Btw I’ve been on about 12 gay cruises, 2 with RSVP and 9 with Atlantis Events and I can tell you..I have seen lots of public sex! Big deal. Rick D, San Diego.
Mike 2:48 pm on July 17, 2012 Permalink |
Totally in agreement with Dallin’s point of view and sentiments. Putting those guys off the ship where they were without passports or their belongings is pure spitefulness and bad juju. Shame on RSVP!
Matthew 3:15 pm on July 17, 2012 Permalink |
I’ve been on one Atlantis cruise but have not traveled with RSVP. To have these young porn stars on their ship just doesn’t fit their ‘brand’. I’m sure there was enough eye candy on the boat already without hiring young twinks. I’ll hold judgement on this until all the facts come out.
cr 7:41 pm on July 17, 2012 Permalink |
Believe me, some of the ‘eye candy’ is hired and that is specifically the reason they were ‘invited’ to join the cruise, from my understanding–for the photographer to do a photo shoot and in which company’s branding and promotional products do you think the shots were to appear? Photo’s of the eternally youthful men, “RSVP told Bel Ami it could film the models frolicking non-sexually around the ship”, certainly not meant to be for the exclusive use of Bel Ami.
Clay Roger 3:35 pm on July 17, 2012 Permalink |
I agree with Rick and Matthew. I have been on the cruises and worked for a cruise line. Would it not be illegal for them to hold their passports? Passports normally belong to the country that issues them so I think the cruise line and RSVP have a made an error. Usually if you are thrown off a ship your passport and belongings should be landed to the local port authority. Bad business….
Robert 3:55 pm on July 17, 2012 Permalink |
Cruise ships always hold the passport of employees.
cr 7:32 pm on July 17, 2012 Permalink |
Just another one of RSVP/Atlantis’ antics to keep their rates as high as possible, not even bothering to put “on sale at a discount” the cabins that do not sell for on a cruise for which they could have had new or loyal clientele filling those unsold spaces.
Instead they, or their entertainment manager, “stage” the unsold cabins with lousy entertainers or, in this case, very young ‘models’ for the main purpose of doing a photo shoot specifically designed to prolong their brand’s lure of promoting sex, youth, and beauty to their ideal target audience; not necessarily to their most loyal cruisers.
Lance 8:15 pm on July 17, 2012 Permalink |
So first of all lets talk about why RSVP felt so lame about their trip which resulted in the uh i’ll say STUPID idea to hire live props. imean come on its a cruise its a GAY cruise do we really need a bunch of hired help from the Czech rRep. to help us have a good time? I say NO !!! and kdos for the boys for filing claim against both RSVP and Holland American.. Dude just cruise and be Cruised and be happy about that. My feeling go out to thosde Boys thown off the ship in such horrible conditions and ya know what somebody need be held resposible
Tad 2:07 pm on July 29, 2012 Permalink |
“godforsaken Tunisia”? As an attorney, I understand the need for the plaintiffs’ attorney to hype up the “damages”, but I feel a lot of reaction shared online about this incident has a tinge of Islamophobia that doesn’t help examine the RSVP/Holland America/Ami boys issue. Do you really think Holland America would come near that port if there was imminent danger? Did the rest of the RSVP guests stay aboard or did they continue on excursions that day?
The overturn of the Tunisian government was by far the least violent of the ensuing “Arab spring” events and many tourists continued to travel there in April after the uprising which was really a winter event. Angelina Jolie went there the first week of April, 2011. Tunisia is a beautiful country and the ruins of Carthage along the sea are spectacular and among the favorite port calls I’ve ever made.
Here is a quote from a TripAdvisor forum re: the safety of coming to Tunisia that spring:
(note they were no longer concerned about Tunisia but about trouble in neighboring Libya)
“Re: Will Libya unrest cause problems for Djerba travel?
”
May 17, 2011, 3:12 PM
I am in Djerba right now and I can reassure you it’s so peaceful and relaxing here, no trouble whatsoever. In fact I was more aware of the worldly troubles back home in England than i am here. They call is the isle of forgetfulness and it really is. I was anxious too before my visit and now I realise I had no reason to be at all. Relax and look forward to your holiday, you have nothing to worry about
I am glad this site included the link to the actual legal complaint so I could gain more insight into this matter. For those who did not read it carefully, they were NOT kicked off without their passports. There was a brief hold of their passports for processing. After they agreed to leave the ship at the next port, albeit under duress, their passports were returned to them. I have been on several cruises during which cruise lines took the passports for processing so that is not uncommon. Hotels abroad also hold them at times – so this in itself is perfectly legal and customary in some settings.
I don’t think the boys were given a fair shake – but it doesn’t sound to me like they were thrown off in “horrible conditions” – esp. not in comparison to the couple put into a Dominican prison cell with a crowd of hostile homophobic tormentors surrounding them. There is not one shred of evidence given in the RSVP/Ami complaint about the conditions they were subjected to other than customary legal hyperbole. I do NOT think this was handled properly – but please don’t make Tunisia circa April 2011 into some horrendous war zone when that was not the case.